vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Primis Financial Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($45.6M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.2× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs 16.0%, a 38.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs 13.0%).
Primis Financial Corp is a U.S.-based financial holding company operating full-service banking subsidiaries. It provides a comprehensive range of financial solutions including personal and commercial deposit products, diverse loan facilities, mortgage services, and wealth management support, primarily serving retail and corporate customers across the U.S. mid-Atlantic region.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
FRST vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $45.6M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $7.3M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | 16.0% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 200.0% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $45.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $80.9M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.2M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.8M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.3M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.7M | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.6M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.2M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -123.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.5% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -100.3% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 33.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.19 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.28 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.92 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.95 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $159.9M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $427.2M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $159.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.6M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.9M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.0M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.5M | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.3M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | $209.9M |
| Q1 26 | $427.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $422.9M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $382.2M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.4M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.6M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.8M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $381.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.0M | $424.8M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $529.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-41.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.5M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $11.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.3% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 9.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.36× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.67× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.82× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.52× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.93× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.21× | 1.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FRST
| Net Interest Income | $32.1M | 70% |
| Noninterest Income | $13.6M | 30% |
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
