vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and HAEMONETICS CORP (HAE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HAEMONETICS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $336.0M, roughly 4.0× Federal Realty Investment Trust). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 7.3%, a 31.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Federal Realty Investment Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs 4.8%). Over the past eight quarters, HAEMONETICS CORP's revenue compounded faster (99.2% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
Haemonetics Corporation is a global provider of blood and plasma supplies and services. The company was founded in Natick, Massachusetts by Dr. Allen (Jack) Latham in the 1970s.
FRT vs HAE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.0M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | $97.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.9% |
| Operating Margin | 53.8% | 83.4% |
| Net Margin | 38.6% | 7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 103.5% | -42.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.49 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $339.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.3M | $327.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.5M | $321.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $309.2M | $330.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.4M | $348.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $303.6M | $345.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.1M | $336.2M |
| Q1 26 | $129.7M | $97.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.9M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.8M | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.5M | $37.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $38.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 59.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 59.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.0% |
| Q1 26 | 53.8% | 83.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.1% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.0% | 11.8% |
| Q1 26 | 38.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.49 | $0.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.78 | $0.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | $1.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.74 | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | $0.66 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $0.74 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $107.4M | $245.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.0B | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $796.3M |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.53× | 1.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $107.4M | $245.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.4M | $363.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.3M | $296.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.0M | $292.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.2M | $306.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.4M | $320.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.0M | $299.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.2M | $344.4M |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | $796.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $911.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $849.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $882.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $820.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $906.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $878.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $905.4M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | 1.53× | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $293.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $209.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 15.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $417.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $293.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $622.4M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.8M | $111.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.7M | $17.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.0M | $116.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $574.6M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.1M | $48.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.7M | $-27.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $209.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $100.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-33.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.80× | 2.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.40× | 2.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.81× | 2.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.77× | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.36× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | -0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
