vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $327.6M, roughly 1.0× Navios Maritime Partners L.P.). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 21.4%, a 17.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Federal Realty Investment Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs -4.3%).

Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.

Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.

FRT vs NMM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FRT
FRT
1.0× larger
FRT
$336.0M
$327.6M
NMM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FRT
FRT
+13.0% gap
FRT
8.7%
-4.3%
NMM
Higher net margin
FRT
FRT
17.3% more per $
FRT
38.6%
21.4%
NMM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025

Metric
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Revenue
$336.0M
$327.6M
Net Profit
$129.7M
$69.9M
Gross Margin
90.5%
Operating Margin
53.8%
Net Margin
38.6%
21.4%
Revenue YoY
8.7%
-4.3%
Net Profit YoY
103.5%
-31.1%
EPS (diluted)
$1.49

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Q1 26
$336.0M
Q4 25
$336.0M
Q3 25
$322.3M
Q2 25
$311.5M
$327.6M
Q1 25
$309.2M
Q4 24
$311.4M
Q3 24
$303.6M
Q2 24
$296.1M
$342.2M
Net Profit
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Q1 26
$129.7M
Q4 25
$129.7M
Q3 25
$61.6M
Q2 25
$155.9M
$69.9M
Q1 25
$63.8M
Q4 24
$65.5M
Q3 24
$61.0M
Q2 24
$112.0M
$101.5M
Gross Margin
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
90.5%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
88.3%
Operating Margin
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Q1 26
53.8%
Q4 25
53.8%
Q3 25
34.3%
Q2 25
65.1%
Q1 25
35.0%
Q4 24
35.1%
Q3 24
34.9%
Q2 24
53.0%
Net Margin
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Q1 26
38.6%
Q4 25
38.6%
Q3 25
19.1%
Q2 25
50.0%
21.4%
Q1 25
20.6%
Q4 24
21.0%
Q3 24
20.1%
Q2 24
37.8%
29.7%
EPS (diluted)
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Q1 26
$1.49
Q4 25
$1.49
Q3 25
$0.69
Q2 25
$1.78
Q1 25
$0.72
Q4 24
$0.74
Q3 24
$0.70
Q2 24
$1.32

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$107.4M
$377.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.0B
$2.0B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.2B
Total Assets
$9.1B
$5.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.53×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Q1 26
$107.4M
Q4 25
$107.4M
Q3 25
$111.3M
Q2 25
$177.0M
$377.0M
Q1 25
$109.2M
Q4 24
$123.4M
Q3 24
$97.0M
Q2 24
$103.2M
$272.0M
Total Debt
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Q1 26
$5.0B
Q4 25
$5.0B
Q3 25
Q2 25
$2.0B
Q1 25
Q4 24
$4.5B
Q3 24
Q2 24
$1.4B
Stockholders' Equity
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Q1 26
$3.2B
Q4 25
$3.2B
Q3 25
$3.2B
Q2 25
$3.2B
Q1 25
$3.2B
Q4 24
$3.2B
Q3 24
$3.1B
Q2 24
$3.0B
Total Assets
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Q1 26
$9.1B
Q4 25
$9.1B
Q3 25
$8.9B
Q2 25
$8.6B
$5.9B
Q1 25
$8.6B
Q4 24
$8.5B
Q3 24
$8.5B
Q2 24
$8.4B
$5.3B
Debt / Equity
FRT
FRT
NMM
NMM
Q1 26
1.53×
Q4 25
1.53×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.42×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons