vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and PROASSURANCE CORP (PRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $269.6M, roughly 1.2× PROASSURANCE CORP). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 12.4%, a 26.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Federal Realty Investment Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs -7.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Federal Realty Investment Trust's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs -2.7%).

Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.

ProAssurance Corporation, headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, is a property and casualty company that sells professional liability insurance to doctors. The company was founded in 1976 as Mutual Assurance and was later renamed to Medical Assurance in 1997. The name "ProAssurance" was created in 2001 when Medical Assurance merged with Professionals Group. The company is currently the fourth largest medical professional liability insurance writer and has over $6 billion in assets.

FRT vs PRA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FRT
FRT
1.2× larger
FRT
$336.0M
$269.6M
PRA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FRT
FRT
+15.7% gap
FRT
8.7%
-7.1%
PRA
Higher net margin
FRT
FRT
26.2% more per $
FRT
38.6%
12.4%
PRA
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FRT
FRT
Annualised
FRT
6.5%
-2.7%
PRA

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Revenue
$336.0M
$269.6M
Net Profit
$129.7M
$33.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
53.8%
17.3%
Net Margin
38.6%
12.4%
Revenue YoY
8.7%
-7.1%
Net Profit YoY
103.5%
106.4%
EPS (diluted)
$1.49
$0.65

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
$336.0M
Q4 25
$336.0M
$269.6M
Q3 25
$322.3M
$279.6M
Q2 25
$311.5M
$276.8M
Q1 25
$309.2M
$272.1M
Q4 24
$311.4M
$290.1M
Q3 24
$303.6M
$285.3M
Q2 24
$296.1M
$290.4M
Net Profit
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
$129.7M
Q4 25
$129.7M
$33.4M
Q3 25
$61.6M
$1.4M
Q2 25
$155.9M
$21.9M
Q1 25
$63.8M
$-5.8M
Q4 24
$65.5M
$16.2M
Q3 24
$61.0M
$16.4M
Q2 24
$112.0M
$15.5M
Operating Margin
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
53.8%
Q4 25
53.8%
17.3%
Q3 25
34.3%
1.6%
Q2 25
65.1%
9.9%
Q1 25
35.0%
-2.3%
Q4 24
35.1%
6.5%
Q3 24
34.9%
7.4%
Q2 24
53.0%
6.2%
Net Margin
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
38.6%
Q4 25
38.6%
12.4%
Q3 25
19.1%
0.5%
Q2 25
50.0%
7.9%
Q1 25
20.6%
-2.1%
Q4 24
21.0%
5.6%
Q3 24
20.1%
5.8%
Q2 24
37.8%
5.3%
EPS (diluted)
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
$1.49
Q4 25
$1.49
$0.65
Q3 25
$0.69
$0.03
Q2 25
$1.78
$0.42
Q1 25
$0.72
$-0.11
Q4 24
$0.74
$0.32
Q3 24
$0.70
$0.32
Q2 24
$1.32
$0.30

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$107.4M
$36.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.0B
$420.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.2B
$1.3B
Total Assets
$9.1B
$5.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.53×
0.31×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
$107.4M
Q4 25
$107.4M
$36.5M
Q3 25
$111.3M
$54.5M
Q2 25
$177.0M
$41.6M
Q1 25
$109.2M
$43.5M
Q4 24
$123.4M
$54.9M
Q3 24
$97.0M
$45.3M
Q2 24
$103.2M
$36.9M
Total Debt
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
$5.0B
Q4 25
$5.0B
$420.4M
Q3 25
$421.5M
Q2 25
$422.6M
Q1 25
$423.7M
Q4 24
$4.5B
$424.9M
Q3 24
$425.9M
Q2 24
$426.9M
Stockholders' Equity
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
$3.2B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$3.2B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$3.2B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$3.2B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$3.1B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$3.0B
$1.1B
Total Assets
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
$9.1B
Q4 25
$9.1B
$5.4B
Q3 25
$8.9B
$5.6B
Q2 25
$8.6B
$5.5B
Q1 25
$8.6B
$5.5B
Q4 24
$8.5B
$5.6B
Q3 24
$8.5B
$5.7B
Q2 24
$8.4B
$5.6B
Debt / Equity
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
1.53×
Q4 25
1.53×
0.31×
Q3 25
0.32×
Q2 25
0.33×
Q1 25
0.34×
Q4 24
1.42×
0.35×
Q3 24
0.35×
Q2 24
0.38×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-25.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.77×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$622.4M
$-25.6M
Q3 25
$147.8M
$27.2M
Q2 25
$150.7M
$-28.1M
Q1 25
$179.0M
$-11.6M
Q4 24
$574.6M
$-10.7M
Q3 24
$144.1M
$14.0M
Q2 24
$169.7M
$-12.8M
Cash Conversion
FRT
FRT
PRA
PRA
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.80×
-0.77×
Q3 25
2.40×
18.81×
Q2 25
0.97×
-1.28×
Q1 25
2.81×
Q4 24
8.77×
-0.66×
Q3 24
2.36×
0.85×
Q2 24
1.52×
-0.83×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FRT
FRT

Segment breakdown not available.

PRA
PRA

Workers Compensation Insurance Segment$164.4M61%
Other$59.6M22%
Segregated Portfolio Cell Reinsurance$45.7M17%

Related Comparisons