vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC (RLGT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $232.1M, roughly 1.4× RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 2.3%, a 36.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Federal Realty Investment Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs -12.3%). Over the past eight quarters, RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
Radiant Logistics, Inc. is a leading third-party logistics provider offering end-to-end supply chain solutions, domestic and international freight forwarding, warehousing, and last-mile delivery services. It primarily serves North American markets, with key client segments including retail, manufacturing, e-commerce, and industrial sectors, helping businesses optimize logistics workflows and cut operational costs.
FRT vs RLGT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.0M | $232.1M |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 53.8% | 3.2% |
| Net Margin | 38.6% | 2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | -12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 103.5% | -18.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.49 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.3M | $226.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.5M | $220.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $309.2M | $214.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.4M | $264.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $303.6M | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.1M | $206.0M |
| Q1 26 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.9M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.5M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $4.8M |
| Q1 26 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.0% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.49 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.78 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.74 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $107.4M | $31.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $229.8M |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $439.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.53× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.4M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.3M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.2M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.4M | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.0M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.2M | $24.9M |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $229.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $226.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $218.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $214.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $212.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $209.4M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $439.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $445.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $426.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $414.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $386.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $375.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | $371.2M |
| Q1 26 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $12.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $8.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $622.4M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.7M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.0M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $574.6M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.1M | $205.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.7M | $1.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $977.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-185.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.80× | 2.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.40× | 1.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.81× | -2.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.77× | 2.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.36× | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | 0.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FRT
Segment breakdown not available.
RLGT
| Transferred Over Time | $201.2M | 87% |
| Other | $25.0M | 11% |
| Value Added Services | $4.2M | 2% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.8M | 1% |