vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA) and Mega Matrix Inc (MPU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mega Matrix Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1M vs $4.0M, roughly 1.5× First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc.). First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2.4% vs -177.4%, a 175.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.6% vs -40.9%).
Sterling Bancorp was an American regional bank holding company that owned Sterling National Bank. It merged into Webster Bank in February 2022.
FSEA vs MPU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.0M | $6.1M |
| Net Profit | $-87.0K | $-10.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | -156.3% |
| Net Margin | -2.4% | -177.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.6% | -40.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 93.8% | -291.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $-0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-87.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $390.0K | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-545.0K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-603.0K | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0K | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | -156.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.7% | -21.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.9% | -32.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.8% | -26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | -177.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.1% | -20.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.1% | -32.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | -26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.08 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.24 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $9.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $63.5M | $37.4M |
| Total Assets | $599.3M | $42.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.2M | $37.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.8M | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $599.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $609.6M | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $604.8M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.6M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $580.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $601.8M | $22.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $576.5M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $449.0K | $-3.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $329.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $449.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $661.0K | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-151.0K | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $573.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-70.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $329.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $640.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-154.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $542.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $264.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-81.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -99.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
