vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $26.0M, roughly 1.6× FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -28.1%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.2% vs -20.7%). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.8M vs $-12.7M). Over the past eight quarters, MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp's revenue compounded faster (-3.4% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
FSP vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.4M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.9% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.7% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.2% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.9% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.9% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.4% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.0% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.1% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.0% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.6% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.2% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.2% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.6M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $607.0M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $892.9M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $607.0M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.3M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.7M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.4M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.9M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.4M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.1M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.9M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $892.9M | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0M | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $903.2M | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $916.4M | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $946.9M | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.5M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.8M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.7M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.6% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 63.0% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.3M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-648.0K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.9M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | -48.6% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.7% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.7% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FSP
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
