vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP) and NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (NRP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.3M vs $26.0M, roughly 2.0× FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP). NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 78.5% vs -28.1%, a 106.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.2% vs -21.8%). Over the past eight quarters, NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP's revenue compounded faster (-8.3% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
Natural Resource Partners LP is a U.S.-headquartered master limited partnership that owns, manages and leases mineral reserve interests. Its asset portfolio covers coal, aggregates, industrial minerals and oil & gas, with operations primarily across North America, deriving most revenue from royalties paid by third-party resource extraction operators.
FSP vs NRP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $51.3M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $40.3M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | 83.7% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | 78.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | -21.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | -28.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | $50.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $54.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $65.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.4M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $42.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | $56.2M |
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.9% | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.9% | 74.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.4% | 84.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.0% | 92.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | 91.0% |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.1% | 78.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.0% | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.6% | 76.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.2% | 84.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.2% | 85.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.6M | $30.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $138.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $607.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $892.9M | $772.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | $30.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $138.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $142.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $188.8M |
| Q4 25 | $607.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $892.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $903.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $916.4M | $772.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $946.9M | $772.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.5M | $772.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $789.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $772.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.8M | $34.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 63.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-648.0K | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $71.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | -48.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FSP
Segment breakdown not available.
NRP
| Coal Royalty Revenues | $35.5M | 69% |
| Soda Ash Segment | $4.6M | 9% |
| Transportation And Processing Services | $4.4M | 9% |
| Production Lease Minimum Revenues | $2.7M | 5% |
| Oil And Gas Royalty Revenues | $2.4M | 5% |
| Other | $1.6M | 3% |
