vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP) and ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.8M vs $26.0M, roughly 1.0× FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP). FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP runs the higher net margin — -28.1% vs -72.1%, a 43.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.2% vs -28.5%). ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-9.9M vs $-12.7M). Over the past eight quarters, FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP's revenue compounded faster (-8.7% CAGR vs -29.7%).
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
FSP vs OSUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $26.8M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $-19.3M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | -75.1% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | -72.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | -28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | -78.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.4M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $-615.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.9% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.7% | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | -75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | -59.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.2% | -57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.9% | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.9% | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.4% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.0% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | -72.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | -50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.5% | -63.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.1% | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.0% | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.6% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.2% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.2% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.6M | $199.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $607.0M | $340.8M |
| Total Assets | $892.9M | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $216.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | $278.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $263.8M |
| Q4 25 | $607.0M | $340.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.3M | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.7M | $380.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.4M | $396.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.9M | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.4M | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.1M | $425.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.9M | $426.3M |
| Q4 25 | $892.9M | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0M | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $903.2M | $445.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $916.4M | $457.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $946.9M | $479.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.5M | $464.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $466.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $467.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.8M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.7M | $-9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.6% | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 63.0% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.3M | $-53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $109.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-648.0K | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.9M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $-347.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | -48.6% | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.7% | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | 2.9% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FSP
Segment breakdown not available.
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |