vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.9× Venus Concept Inc.). FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP runs the higher net margin — -28.1% vs -163.8%, a 135.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Venus Concept Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.2% vs -8.2%). Venus Concept Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.9M vs $-12.7M). Over the past eight quarters, FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP's revenue compounded faster (-8.7% CAGR vs -12.8%).
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
FSP vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.4M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.9% | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.7% | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.2% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.9% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.9% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.4% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.0% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.5% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.1% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.0% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.6% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.2% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.2% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.6M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $607.0M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $892.9M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $607.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.4M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.4M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.1M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.9M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $892.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $903.2M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $916.4M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $946.9M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.5M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.8M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.7M | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.6% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 63.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.3M | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-648.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.9M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | -48.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.7% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.7% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | 0.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FSP
Segment breakdown not available.
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
