vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP) and Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $17.3M, roughly 1.5× Valens Semiconductor Ltd.). FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP runs the higher net margin — -28.1% vs -42.2%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Valens Semiconductor Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -8.2%). Valens Semiconductor Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.9M vs $-12.7M).
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
Valens Semiconductor (Valens) is an Israeli fabless manufacturing company providing semiconductors for the automotive and audio-video industries. Valens provides semiconductor products for the distribution of uncompressed ultra-high-definition (UHD) multimedia content and in-vehicle connectivity applications. The company is a member of the MIPI Alliance and developed the first-to-market chipset that is compliant with the MIPI A-PHY standard. Valens invented the technology behind the HDBaseT s...
FSP vs VLN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $17.3M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $-7.3M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 63.0% |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | -46.4% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | -42.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | 29.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.4M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.9% | 63.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | 63.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | 56.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | 61.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | -46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.2% | -43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.9% | -56.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.4% | -76.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.0% | -69.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | -42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.5% | -42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.1% | -49.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.6% | -64.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.2% | -65.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.6M | $93.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $607.0M | $108.8M |
| Total Assets | $892.9M | $136.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $93.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | $102.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $112.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $105.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $607.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.3M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.7M | $116.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.4M | $128.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.4M | $147.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.1M | $153.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $892.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0M | $136.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $903.2M | $144.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $916.4M | $154.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $946.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.5M | $171.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $175.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.8M | $-4.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.7M | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.6% | -28.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 63.0% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.3M | $-11.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-211.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-648.0K | $-225.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $-330.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.9M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $-460.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | -48.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.7% | -47.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.7% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
