vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM) and Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.3M vs $14.8M, roughly 1.2× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs -42.2%, a 50.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.8% vs 8.1%). EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-975.0K vs $-4.9M).
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
Valens Semiconductor (Valens) is an Israeli fabless manufacturing company providing semiconductors for the automotive and audio-video industries. Valens provides semiconductor products for the distribution of uncompressed ultra-high-definition (UHD) multimedia content and in-vehicle connectivity applications. The company is a member of the MIPI Alliance and developed the first-to-market chipset that is compliant with the MIPI A-PHY standard. Valens invented the technology behind the HDBaseT s...
MRAM vs VLN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.8M | $17.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.2M | $-7.3M |
| Gross Margin | 50.8% | 63.0% |
| Operating Margin | -7.2% | -46.4% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | -42.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.8% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1.5% | 29.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.1M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.0K | $-7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-670.0K | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-202.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 63.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | 63.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.4% | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.2% | 56.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.0% | 61.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | -46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.9% | -43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.7% | -56.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.5% | -76.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.5% | -69.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | -42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.1% | -42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | -49.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | -64.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.5% | -65.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $44.5M | $93.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $68.9M | $108.8M |
| Total Assets | $84.6M | $136.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.3M | $93.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.0M | $102.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $112.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.8M | $105.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.8M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.1M | $116.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.0M | $128.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.3M | $147.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4M | $153.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.3M | $136.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.9M | $144.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.2M | $154.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | $171.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.6M | $175.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.6M | $-4.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-975.0K | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | -28.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 24.3% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.1M | $-11.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $881.0K | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $-211.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-225.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-975.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $543.0K | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $-330.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $527.0K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-460.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.9% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | -47.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MRAM
| Transferred At Point In Time | $13.7M | 92% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.1M | 8% |
VLN
Segment breakdown not available.
