vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FOSTER L B CO (FSTR) and Opera Ltd (OPRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FOSTER L B CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($160.4M vs $142.7M, roughly 1.1× Opera Ltd). Opera Ltd runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 1.5%, a 11.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Foster L B Co. is a U.S.-headquartered industrial manufacturing firm that develops, produces and distributes engineered access solutions, construction components, and rail infrastructure products. It serves commercial construction, transportation, and industrial end markets across North America and selected international regions.
Opera is a multinational technology corporation headquartered in Oslo, Norway, with additional offices in Europe, China, and Africa. Opera offers a range of products and services that include PC and mobile web browsers, GameMaker and gaming portals, the Opera News content recommendation products, the Opera Ads platform, and a number of Web3 and e-commerce products and services. The company's total user base is 296 million monthly active users.
FSTR vs OPRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $160.4M | $142.7M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $18.3M |
| Gross Margin | 19.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 1098.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.22 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $160.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.8M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $128.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.8M | $211.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $18.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-242.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.2% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.27 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.40 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $42.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $175.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $330.4M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $175.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $174.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $174.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $170.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $181.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $330.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $333.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $349.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $344.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $326.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.54× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $19.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-26.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-24.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.74× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FSTR
| Rail Technologies And Services Segment | $98.0M | 61% |
| Over Time Output Method | $26.3M | 16% |
| Services | $19.4M | 12% |
| Rail Technologies Products | $10.0M | 6% |
| Over Time Input Method | $8.3M | 5% |
OPRA
Segment breakdown not available.
