vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FUEL TECH, INC. (FTEK) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.5M vs $7.2M, roughly 1.6× FUEL TECH, INC.). On growth, FUEL TECH, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.2% vs 11.9%). TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($589.0K vs $-2.0M). Over the past eight quarters, FUEL TECH, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (20.9% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Rocket Fuel was an ad technology company based in Redwood City, California. It was founded in 2008 by alumni of Yahoo!.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
FTEK vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.2M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 44.6% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | -19.7% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | 37.2% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.2M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $303.0K | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-689.0K | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-739.0K | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.0K | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-421.0K | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $281.0K | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 44.6% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.9% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.5% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.4% | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.3% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.4% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.9% | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.9% | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | -19.7% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.9% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -40.1% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.2% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -34.1% | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $24.9M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.9M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $47.2M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $24.9M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.8M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.7M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.4M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.1M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $39.9M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.0M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.9M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.6M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.0M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $47.2M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.9M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.7M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.1M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.4M | $51.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.6M | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.0M | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -27.7% | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.1% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.3M | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $879.0K | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.0M | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $767.0K | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | -27.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.6% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.4% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.22× | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.99× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTEK
| Transferred At Point In Time | $5.3M | 73% |
| Other | $2.0M | 27% |
TACT
Segment breakdown not available.