vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. (FTLF) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.9× Laird Superfood, Inc.). FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -13.2%, a 19.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (72.6% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, FITLIFE BRANDS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.1% CAGR vs 16.1%).
FitLife Brands, Inc. is a health and wellness firm developing, marketing and distributing premium nutritional supplements, sports nutrition products and weight management solutions. It serves North American fitness enthusiasts, athletes and health-focused consumers via retail and e-commerce channels.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
FTLF vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 72.6% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.8% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $921.0K | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.0% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.1% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.6M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $106.3M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.4M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $106.3M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.2M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.5M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.3M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.5M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $244.0K | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $239.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $244.0K | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $957.0K | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $239.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.33× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTLF
| US | $24.3M | 94% |
| Other | $1.7M | 6% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
