vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. (FTLF) and NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (NRP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.3M vs $25.9M, roughly 2.0× FITLIFE BRANDS, INC.). NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 78.5% vs 6.3%, a 72.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (72.6% vs -21.8%). Over the past eight quarters, FITLIFE BRANDS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.1% CAGR vs -8.3%).
FitLife Brands, Inc. is a health and wellness firm developing, marketing and distributing premium nutritional supplements, sports nutrition products and weight management solutions. It serves North American fitness enthusiasts, athletes and health-focused consumers via retail and e-commerce channels.
Natural Resource Partners LP is a U.S.-headquartered master limited partnership that owns, manages and leases mineral reserve interests. Its asset portfolio covers coal, aggregates, industrial minerals and oil & gas, with operations primarily across North America, deriving most revenue from royalties paid by third-party resource extraction operators.
FTLF vs NRP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $51.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $40.3M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 83.7% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 78.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 72.6% | -21.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.8% | -28.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | $50.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | $54.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | $65.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $921.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $42.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $56.2M |
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | 74.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 84.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | 92.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 91.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | 78.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | 76.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | 84.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.1% | 85.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $30.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $138.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $106.3M | $772.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $138.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | $142.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | $188.8M |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $106.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.2M | $772.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.5M | $772.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $772.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.3M | $789.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.5M | $772.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $244.0K | $34.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $239.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.15× | 0.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $244.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $957.0K | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $71.5M |
| Q4 25 | $239.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.46× | 1.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.96× | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.33× | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTLF
| US | $24.3M | 94% |
| Other | $1.7M | 6% |
NRP
| Coal Royalty Revenues | $35.5M | 69% |
| Soda Ash Segment | $4.6M | 9% |
| Transportation And Processing Services | $4.4M | 9% |
| Production Lease Minimum Revenues | $2.7M | 5% |
| Oil And Gas Royalty Revenues | $2.4M | 5% |
| Other | $1.6M | 3% |
