vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. (FTLF) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.8× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs 6.3%, a 31.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (72.6% vs -1.5%). FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($239.0K vs $-3.6M).
FitLife Brands, Inc. is a health and wellness firm developing, marketing and distributing premium nutritional supplements, sports nutrition products and weight management solutions. It serves North American fitness enthusiasts, athletes and health-focused consumers via retail and e-commerce channels.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
FTLF vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 72.6% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.8% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $921.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.6M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $106.3M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $106.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.8M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.3M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $244.0K | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $239.0K | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.15× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.4M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $244.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $957.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $239.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.68× | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.33× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTLF
| US | $24.3M | 94% |
| Other | $1.7M | 6% |
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.
