vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortive (FTV) and Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fortive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $745.1M, roughly 1.4× Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.). Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 12.8%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.3% vs 7.7%). Fortive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($193.8M vs $-64.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs -17.0%).
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. operates a network of premium athletic, fitness and wellness destinations across the United States. It offers diverse services including state-of-the-art gym facilities, group exercise classes, personal training, spa treatments, nutrition coaching, youth programs and co-working spaces for consumers pursuing holistic healthy lifestyles.
FTV vs LTH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $745.1M |
| Net Profit | $136.4M | $123.0M |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 17.9% | 17.4% |
| Net Margin | 12.8% | 16.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.7% | 12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.1% | 231.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $745.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $782.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $761.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $706.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $663.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $693.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $667.8M |
| Q1 26 | $136.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.7M | $123.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $102.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.6M | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.9M | $76.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.8M | $37.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.6M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.1M | $52.8M |
| Q1 26 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 63.2% | 49.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.2% | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.0% | 47.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | 47.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | 48.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.0% | 46.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | 46.8% |
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 7.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $356.1M | $204.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.5B | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.1B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $11.6B | $8.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | 0.48× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $356.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $375.5M | $204.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.8M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $175.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.1M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $813.3M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.3M | $120.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | $34.5M |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.7B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3B | $7.1B |
| Q1 26 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | 0.78× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $234.8M | $239.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $193.8M | $-64.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.1% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 40.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.72× | 1.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $935.2M | $-21.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $234.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $239.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.2M | $195.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.7M | $183.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $502.2M | $163.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.9M | $170.4M |
| Q1 26 | $193.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.8M | $-64.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.1M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.5M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.0M | $41.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.2M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.7M | $26.1M |
| Q1 26 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 3.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 40.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 21.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.83× | 1.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.99× | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 2.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.41× | 2.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.41× | 4.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.07× | 3.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 3.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTV
Segment breakdown not available.
LTH
| Membership | $535.1M | 72% |
| In Center | $191.2M | 26% |
| Other | $18.8M | 3% |
