vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortive (FTV) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fortive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $704.9M, roughly 1.5× SM Energy Co). On growth, Fortive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.7% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SM Energy Co's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs -17.0%).
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
FTV vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $136.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.9% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 12.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 7.7% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $634.6M |
| Q1 26 | $136.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.6M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.9M | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.6M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.1M | $210.3M |
| Q1 26 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 44.0% |
| Q1 26 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 33.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $1.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $356.1M | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.1B | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $11.6B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $356.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $375.5M | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.8M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.1M | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $813.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | $487.9M |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.7B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3B | $6.7B |
| Q1 26 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $234.8M | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $193.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.72× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $935.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $234.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.2M | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.7M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $502.2M | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.9M | $476.4M |
| Q1 26 | $193.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.99× | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.41× | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.07× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 2.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.