vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortive (FTV) and ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (ZION). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fortive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $891.0M, roughly 1.2× ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION runs the higher net margin — 29.5% vs 12.8%, a 16.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs 7.7%). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION produced more free cash flow last quarter ($952.0M vs $193.8M). Over the past eight quarters, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION's revenue compounded faster (9.6% CAGR vs -17.0%).
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
Zions Bancorporation is an American national bank headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. It operates as a national bank rather than as a bank holding company and does business under the following seven brands: Zions Bank, Amegy Bank of Texas, California Bank and Trust, National Bank of Arizona, Nevada State Bank, Vectra Bank Colorado, and the Commerce Bank of Washington.
FTV vs ZION — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $891.0M |
| Net Profit | $136.4M | $263.0M |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 12.8% | 29.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.7% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.1% | 21.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $1.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $891.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $861.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $838.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $795.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $820.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $777.0M |
| Q1 26 | $136.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.7M | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $222.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.6M | $244.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.9M | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.8M | $216.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.6M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.1M | $201.0M |
| Q1 26 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 25.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $1.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $1.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $1.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $1.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $356.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.5B | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.1B | $7.2B |
| Total Assets | $11.6B | $89.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $356.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $375.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $813.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $970.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $964.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $950.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $548.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $546.0M |
| Q1 26 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2B | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.7B | $89.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $88.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $88.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $88.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0B | $88.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $87.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3B | $87.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | 0.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $234.8M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $193.8M | $952.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.1% | 106.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.72× | 4.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $935.2M | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $234.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $438.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.2M | $-62.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.7M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $502.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.9M | $251.0M |
| Q1 26 | $193.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.8M | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.1M | $413.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.5M | $-93.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.0M | $152.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.2M | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.7M | $234.0M |
| Q1 26 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 106.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | -11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.7% | 128.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 30.1% |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.83× | 4.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.99× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | -0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.41× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.41× | 5.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.07× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
