vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $336.2M, roughly 1.6× FULTON FINANCIAL CORP). FULTON FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.2% vs 27.9%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FULTON FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
FULT vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.2M | $542.5M |
| Net Profit | $94.8M | $151.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 36.4% |
| Net Margin | 28.2% | 27.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.3% | -9.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.6M | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $324.1M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.4M | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $319.6M | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.7M | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.7M | $500.2M |
| Q1 26 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.0M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.5M | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.2M | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.0M | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.6M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.0M | $119.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.7% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.2% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.8% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 32.1% |
| Q1 26 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $211.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $32.2B | $19.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $126.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $10.6B |
| Q1 26 | $32.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1B | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.1B | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.2B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $19.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $258.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $304.5M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.1M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $703.0K | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.6M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.0M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.8M | $294.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.08× | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.16× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.07× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.35× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | 2.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
