vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FULTON FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.2M vs $172.9M, roughly 1.9× UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\). UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ runs the higher net margin — 38.4% vs 28.2%, a 10.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\'s revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
FULT vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.2M | $172.9M |
| Net Profit | $94.8M | $66.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 38.9% |
| Net Margin | 28.2% | 38.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.3% | 44.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $1.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.6M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $324.1M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.4M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $319.6M | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.7M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.7M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.0M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.5M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.2M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.0M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.6M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.0M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.7% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.2% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.8% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.5% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.53 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.36 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $602.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $32.2B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $32.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $31.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $15.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 9.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $154.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $304.5M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.1M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $703.0K | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.6M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.0M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.8M | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.08× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.16× | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.07× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.35× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FULT
Segment breakdown not available.
OLED
| Material Sales | $95.5M | 55% |
| Other | $72.6M | 42% |
| Contract Research Services | $4.8M | 3% |
