vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.2M vs $104.0M, roughly 1.4× Origin Bancorp, Inc.). Origin Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.6% vs 25.2%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Origin Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.9% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Southern Bancorp is a community development financial institution headquartered in Arkadelphia, Arkansas. It was founded in 1986 as Southern Development Bancorporation, and is often referred to simply as "Southern".
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
OBK vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.0M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $27.7M | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | 26.6% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.89 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $104.0M | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $103.4M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.8M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.5M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.1M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.3M | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.8M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.4M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | $27.7M | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.5M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.6M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.4M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.6M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.2% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.3% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.4% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.7% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | 26.6% | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.5% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.8% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.8% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.89 | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.95 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.47 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.71 | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.60 | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $10.2B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $424.2M | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $626.9M | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $334.1M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $486.2M | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $470.2M | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.2M | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $288.1M | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $10.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $158.9M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.3M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.6M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.6M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.5M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9M | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.1M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.8M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.8M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.4M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.2M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 146.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.7% | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.5% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 110.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.5% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.38× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.88× | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.60× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.13× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OBK
| Net Interest Income | $87.2M | 84% |
| Noninterest Income | $16.8M | 16% |
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
