vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) and IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.6M vs $16.9M, roughly 1.5× FVCBankcorp, Inc.). On growth, FVCBankcorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4377.5% vs 2.1%). FVCBankcorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($23.8M vs $1.5M). Over the past eight quarters, FVCBankcorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (586.6% CAGR vs 10.5%).
FVCBankcorp, Inc. is a Virginia-based U.S. bank holding company operating FVCbank, a community-focused financial institution. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking products including deposit accounts, business and personal loans, mortgage services, and wealth management solutions, serving SMEs, professionals and individual consumers across the Mid-Atlantic region.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
FVCB vs ITP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.9M | $25.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | 43.7% | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | — | -5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4377.5% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 26.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $16.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $416.0K | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $382.0K | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $378.0K | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $412.0K | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.0K | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $359.0K | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $-77.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | 43.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.9% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -51.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1341.1% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1352.1% | -32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1133.3% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1001.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 373.3% | -54.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.28 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $253.6M | $152.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $175.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | $253.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $249.8M | $152.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $243.2M | $152.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $242.3M | $152.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.4M | $156.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.8M | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226.5M | $163.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.7M | $164.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $175.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $175.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $177.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $190.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $191.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $177.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $23.9M | $1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $23.8M | $1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 140.7% | 5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.0M | $3.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.2M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $721.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2M | $624.4K |
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $668.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $615.4K |
| Q4 25 | 140.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1818.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1413.6% | -22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4786.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1121.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 361.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1988.3% | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.9% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.34× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
