vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) and Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FrontView REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.5M vs $15.3M, roughly 1.1× Innoviz Technologies Ltd.). FrontView REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -24.9% vs -100.9%, a 76.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Luminar Technologies Inc. was an American technology company that developed vision-based lidar and machine perception technologies, primarily for self-driving cars. The company's headquarters and main research and development facilities were in Orlando, Florida; a second major office was located in Palo Alto, California.
FVR vs INVZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.5M | $15.3M |
| Net Profit | $-4.1M | $-15.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 15.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -103.4% |
| Net Margin | -24.9% | -100.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-833.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -103.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -24.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | -100.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.5M | $17.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $314.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $391.2M | $89.7M |
| Total Assets | $854.4M | $151.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.80× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.6M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $314.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $391.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.2M | $89.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $369.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $854.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $846.8M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $856.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $860.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $42.1M | $-13.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-14.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -91.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -91.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
