vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) and Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FrontView REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.5M vs $12.5M, roughly 1.3× Workhorse Group Inc.). FrontView REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -24.9% vs -166.5%, a 141.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Workhorse Group is an original equipment manufacturer and technology company headquartered in Sharonville, Ohio, USA. In 2025, it merged its operations with those of Motiv Electric Trucks, forming a new entity known as Workhorse.
FVR vs WKHS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.5M | $12.5M |
| Net Profit | $-4.1M | $-20.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | -28.6% |
| Net Margin | -24.9% | -166.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 432.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -171.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.6M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $640.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $842.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.1M | $-20.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-833.0K | $-20.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-29.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -323.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -130.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -164.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -694.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -255.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2002.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -564.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2435.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1771.6% |
| Q4 25 | -24.9% | -166.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | -328.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.5% | -260.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | -3221.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1233.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.7% | -1001.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3124.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2177.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-1.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $-4.68 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.98 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-17.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-24.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.5M | $12.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $314.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $391.2M | $43.0M |
| Total Assets | $854.4M | $117.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.80× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.6M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $314.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $391.2M | $43.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.2M | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $369.9M | $22.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.7M | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-40.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0K | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $67.4M |
| Q4 25 | $854.4M | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $846.8M | $116.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $856.5M | $99.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $860.8M | $115.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0K | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $105.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $113.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $42.1M | $-10.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-11.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -89.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.1M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-18.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-21.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -89.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1275.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1523.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1567.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 225.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
