vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) and Xencor Inc (XNCR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Xencor Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($28.2M vs $18.2M, roughly 1.6× FrontView REIT, Inc.). FrontView REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -23.6%, a 25.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FrontView REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs -46.5%).
Xencor Inc is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing engineered antibody and protein therapeutics using its proprietary technology platform. Its pipeline targets oncology, autoimmune disorders, and inflammatory diseases, and it collaborates with global pharmaceutical partners to advance candidates addressing unmet medical needs across major markets.
FVR vs XNCR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.2M | $28.2M |
| Net Profit | $400.0K | $-6.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.9% | -189.9% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | -23.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 85.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.6M | $43.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $52.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $23.9M |
| Q1 26 | $400.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.1M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-833.0K | $-48.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-45.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-46.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-67.3M |
| Q1 26 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -189.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -226.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -76.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -131.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -310.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -231.6% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -24.9% | -23.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | -28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.5% | -70.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | -147.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -86.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.7% | -260.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -281.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.66 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.72 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.3M | $54.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $514.2M | $635.6M |
| Total Assets | $869.8M | $875.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.5M | $54.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.6M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $44.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | $39.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $314.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $514.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $391.2M | $635.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.2M | $625.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $369.9M | $620.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.7M | $639.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $677.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0K | $708.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $550.5M |
| Q1 26 | $869.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $854.4M | $875.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $846.8M | $868.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $856.5M | $879.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $860.8M | $904.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $951.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0K | $999.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $840.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-51.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-52.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -187.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-138.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.1M | $-51.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $-36.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-49.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-67.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-52.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-31.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-36.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-29.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-70.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -187.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -147.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -84.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -54.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -97.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -165.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -294.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
