vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (FYBR) and MODINE MANUFACTURING CO (MOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $805.0M, roughly 1.9× MODINE MANUFACTURING CO). Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -5.0% vs -5.9%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.5% vs 4.2%). MODINE MANUFACTURING CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-17.1M vs $-315.0M). Over the past eight quarters, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO's revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs 4.3%).
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. is an American telecommunications company with a fiber-optic network and cloud-based services owned by Verizon. It was previously known as Citizens Utilities Co., Citizens Communications Co., and Frontier Communications Corp.
Modine Manufacturing is a thermal management company established in 1916 in the United States. The company started as Modine Manufacturing Company by Arthur B Modine who patented the Spirex radiator for tractors. The Modine company manufactured the Turbotube radiator for Ford Model T cars. The company built the world's first vehicular wind tunnel in Racine, Wisconsin in 1941. During WWII, Modine manufactured aftercoolers for the P-51 Mustang fighter plane. After WWII, Modine introduced the Ai...
FYBR vs MOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $805.0M |
| Net Profit | $-76.0M | $-47.4M |
| Gross Margin | 64.3% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | -5.0% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 30.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.3% | -215.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | $-0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $805.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $738.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $682.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $647.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $658.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $661.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $603.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-47.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-76.0M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-123.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-64.0M | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.0M | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.0M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-123.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0M | $25.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.3% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.2% | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 64.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.4% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.8% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.9% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.30 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.49 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.26 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.48 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.49 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $336.0M | $98.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.7B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $21.6B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.0M | $124.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $506.0M | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $750.0M | $83.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $60.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $525.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $482.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $296.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $359.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $405.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $399.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $910.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $855.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $858.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $747.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.2B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $504.0M | $24.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-315.0M | $-17.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.5% | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 53.4% | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.4B | $-20.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $504.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.0M | $27.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $519.0M | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $294.0M | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $618.0M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $335.0M | $39.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-315.0M | $-30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-368.0M | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-238.0M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-498.0M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-81.0M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-252.0M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-331.0M | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.5% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.5% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.1% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 335.00× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FYBR
| Consumer | $826.0M | 54% |
| Business And Wholesale | $707.0M | 46% |
MOD
| Data Centers | $296.9M | 37% |
| Performance Technologies | $266.0M | 33% |
| Hvac Technologies | $107.1M | 13% |
| Air Cooled | $92.4M | 11% |
| Lb White | $25.6M | 3% |
| Climate By Design | $10.2M | 1% |
| Absolutaire | $7.0M | 1% |
