vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gambling.com Group Ltd (GAMB) and IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.6M vs $15.9M, roughly 1.6× Gambling.com Group Ltd). Gambling.com Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs -5.7%, a 6.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gambling.com Group is a performance marketing and sports betting media company. The company provides digital marketing services for the online gambling industry.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
GAMB vs ITP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.9M | $25.6M |
| Net Profit | $56.0K | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 96.9% | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | -14.1% | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.4% | -5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 26.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $21.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-77.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -51.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -18.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -54.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -19.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $85.0M | $152.0M |
| Total Assets | $131.8M | $175.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $11.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $152.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $152.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $152.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $156.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $163.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $164.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $168.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $175.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $175.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $177.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $190.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $191.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $177.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $194.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.4M | $1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 59.96× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $3.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $721.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $624.4K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $5.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $668.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $615.4K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-7.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -36.7% |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 62.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GAMB
| Performance Marketing | $12.3M | 77% |
| Sports | $3.8M | 24% |
ITP
Segment breakdown not available.
