vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Galiano Gold Inc. (GAU) and TECK RESOURCES LTD (TECK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TECK RESOURCES LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3B vs $166.8M, roughly 37.6× Galiano Gold Inc.).
Galiano Gold Inc. is a Canada-based mineral exploration and production firm focused on gold assets. Its core operation is the Asanko Gold Mine in Ghana, West Africa. It extracts, processes and sells gold products to global precious metals markets, catering to both industrial clients and investment sector purchasers.
Teck Resources Limited is a diversified natural resources company headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, that is engaged in mining and mineral development, including coal for the steelmaking industry, copper, zinc, and energy. Secondary products include lead, silver, gold, molybdenum, germanium, indium and cadmium. Teck Resources was formed from the amalgamation of Teck and Cominco in 2001.
GAU vs TECK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $166.8M | $6.3B |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.0% |
| Operating Margin | 24.3% | -3.0% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $166.8M | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.7M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.1M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.7M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 23 | $239.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $162.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.2% | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -0.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 1.3% | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $41.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.30× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
