vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC (GCBC) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.2M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.6× Venus Concept Inc.). GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 46.3% vs -163.8%, a 210.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.8% vs -8.2%). GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($6.2M vs $-4.9M). Over the past eight quarters, GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs -12.8%).
Bank of Greene County is an American federally-chartered savings bank headquartered in Catskill, NY. The bank's branches are located in the Upstate New York counties of Greene, Columbia, Albany, Ulster, and Rensselaer.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
GCBC vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.2M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $10.3M | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | 52.0% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | 46.3% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.8% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.4% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.60 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.5M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.5M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.9M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.6M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.7M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $10.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | 52.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.4% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.5% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.6% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.0% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.6% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.2% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.4% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.2% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.1% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.6% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.3% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.55 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.37 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.34 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $258.3M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $155.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $190.4M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $258.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $238.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $229.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.3M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $199.2M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.4M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.2M | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.0% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $47.3M | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.0M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.3M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.4M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.4% | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 133.3% | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.6% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 141.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.3% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.2% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.95× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCBC
Segment breakdown not available.
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
