vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCL Global Holdings Ltd (GCL) and Phreesia, Inc. (PHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Phreesia, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.3M vs $98.7M, roughly 1.2× GCL Global Holdings Ltd). Phreesia, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs -5.2%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Phreesia, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($12.2M vs $-5.2M).
GCL Global Holdings Ltd is a leading clean energy enterprise focusing on R&D, production and operation of photovoltaic products, energy storage systems and low-carbon energy solutions. Its main markets cover Asia, Europe, North America, serving utility, commercial and residential distributed energy users across the globe.
Phreesia, Inc. is a software as a service company that offers healthcare organizations a set of applications to automate and manage patient intake.
GCL vs PHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $98.7M | $120.3M |
| Net Profit | $-5.1M | $4.3M |
| Gross Margin | 11.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | -5.2% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 12.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 129.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $120.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.7M | $117.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.1M | $115.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $654.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.6M | $106.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $52.0M | $3.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.1M | $320.3M |
| Total Assets | $159.9M | $423.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.57× | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $106.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.6M | $98.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2M | $90.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.0M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $320.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.9M | $282.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $423.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.9M | $408.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.6M | $400.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.8M | $15.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.2M | $12.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.3% | 10.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.2M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.5M | $11.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCL
Segment breakdown not available.
PHR
| Subscription And Services | $55.5M | 46% |
| Network Solutions | $37.4M | 31% |
| Payment Processing Fees | $27.4M | 23% |