vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCL Global Holdings Ltd (GCL) and Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. (STOK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($158.6M vs $98.7M, roughly 1.6× GCL Global Holdings Ltd). Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 71.2% vs -5.2%, a 76.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($131.7M vs $-5.2M).
GCL Global Holdings Ltd is a leading clean energy enterprise focusing on R&D, production and operation of photovoltaic products, energy storage systems and low-carbon energy solutions. Its main markets cover Asia, Europe, North America, serving utility, commercial and residential distributed energy users across the globe.
Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing innovative RNA-targeted therapies for severe rare genetic diseases. Its lead candidates address unmet needs for Dravet syndrome, a rare epilepsy, and other neurological monogenic disorders, serving patients across North America and global markets.
GCL vs STOK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $98.7M | $158.6M |
| Net Profit | $-5.1M | $112.9M |
| Gross Margin | 11.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | 70.2% |
| Net Margin | -5.2% | 71.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 3661.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 528.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $1.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $98.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $158.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-2.5M |
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $112.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-30.7M |
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 70.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -60.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 1340.7% |
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -46.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 1235.6% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.69 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.6M | $274.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $52.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.1M | $350.1M |
| Total Assets | $159.9M | $406.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $274.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $128.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $192.1M |
| Q3 25 | $52.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $350.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $229.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $190.2M |
| Q3 25 | $159.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $406.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $271.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $256.9M |
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.8M | $131.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.2M | $131.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.3% | 83.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-21.8M |
| Q3 25 | $-5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-22.6M |
| Q3 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -102.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 912.5% |
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -33.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.84× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
