vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCL Global Holdings Ltd (GCL) and Telesat Corp (TSAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GCL Global Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($98.7M vs $73.8M, roughly 1.3× Telesat Corp). GCL Global Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — -5.2% vs -119.8%, a 114.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
GCL Global Holdings Ltd is a leading clean energy enterprise focusing on R&D, production and operation of photovoltaic products, energy storage systems and low-carbon energy solutions. Its main markets cover Asia, Europe, North America, serving utility, commercial and residential distributed energy users across the globe.
Telesat, formerly Telesat Canada, is a Canadian satellite communications company founded on May 2, 1969. The company is headquartered in Ottawa.
GCL vs TSAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $98.7M | $73.8M |
| Net Profit | $-5.1M | $-88.4M |
| Gross Margin | 11.0% | 95.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | 5.9% |
| Net Margin | -5.2% | -119.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $98.7M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.1M | $77.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $152.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $363.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $552.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $372.4M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $185.8M |
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-88.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-52.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $547.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-172.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $56.3M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $60.6M |
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 95.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 95.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -6.7% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | -119.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 71.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 150.7% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -31.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 32.6% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.6M | $352.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $52.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.1M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $159.9M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $16.6M | $352.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2M | $399.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $552.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $1.7B |
| Q3 25 | $52.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $1.8B |
| Q3 25 | $159.9M | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.6M | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $6.5B |
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.84× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
