vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCL Global Holdings Ltd (GCL) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.6M vs $98.7M, roughly 1.3× GCL Global Holdings Ltd). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs -5.2%, a 22.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
GCL Global Holdings Ltd is a leading clean energy enterprise focusing on R&D, production and operation of photovoltaic products, energy storage systems and low-carbon energy solutions. Its main markets cover Asia, Europe, North America, serving utility, commercial and residential distributed energy users across the globe.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
GCL vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $98.7M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $-5.1M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 11.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -5.2% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.7M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.1M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.7% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.6M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $52.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.1M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $159.9M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.6M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.8M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.3M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.2M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.84× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCL
Segment breakdown not available.
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
