vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($331.0M vs $177.1M, roughly 1.9× GCM Grosvenor Inc.). GCM Grosvenor Inc. runs the higher net margin — 32.8% vs 7.1%, a 25.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 7.2%). Over the past eight quarters, GCM Grosvenor Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.5% CAGR vs -2.3%).
GCM Grosvenor is an American alternative asset management firm, with approximately $76 billion in assets under management and approximately 530 professionals as of 2023.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
GCMG vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $177.1M | $331.0M |
| Net Profit | $58.2M | $23.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 30.9% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 32.8% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.2% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 149.2% | 81.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $177.1M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.7M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.8M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.3M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.9M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.0M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.2M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.0K | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.7% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.23 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $242.1M | $61.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $428.4M | $196.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $27.0M | $634.6M |
| Total Assets | $813.8M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 15.87× | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.3M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.5M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.5M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.4M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.9M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.4M | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.3M | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $430.2M | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.1M | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $432.0M | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $432.9M | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.8M | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $634.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.0M | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.3M | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.3M | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.6M | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-31.9M | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-28.5M | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $813.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $685.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $636.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $579.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $575.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $543.9M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.87× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $183.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 98.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.16× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $326.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $183.5M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.8M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.0M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.8M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $175.0M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.3M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.8M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.1M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.0M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.2M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8M | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 98.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.9% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.16× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.61× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.72× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.84× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.54× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.60× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.64× | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCMG
| Asset Management1 | $108.6M | 61% |
| Management Service Incentive Performance Fees | $61.7M | 35% |
| Management Service Incentive Carried Interest | $5.1M | 3% |
| Service Other | $1.8M | 1% |
TILE
| AMS | $195.7M | 59% |
| EAAA | $135.4M | 41% |