vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $177.1M, roughly 1.2× GCM Grosvenor Inc.). GCM Grosvenor Inc. runs the higher net margin — 32.8% vs 5.8%, a 27.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs 7.2%). GCM Grosvenor Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, GCM Grosvenor Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.5% CAGR vs 9.5%).
GCM Grosvenor is an American alternative asset management firm, with approximately $76 billion in assets under management and approximately 530 professionals as of 2023.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
GCMG vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $177.1M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $58.2M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 30.9% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 32.8% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.2% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 149.2% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $177.1M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.7M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.8M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.3M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.9M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.0M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $108.9M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $58.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.0K | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | 30.9% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.7% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 32.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.23 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $242.1M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $428.4M | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $27.0M | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $813.8M | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 15.87× | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.3M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.5M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.5M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.4M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.9M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.9M | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | $428.4M | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.3M | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $430.2M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.1M | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $432.0M | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $432.9M | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.8M | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $384.0M | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | $27.0M | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.3M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.3M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.6M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-31.9M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-28.5M | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.4M | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | $813.8M | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $685.9M | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $636.9M | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $579.8M | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.7M | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $575.0M | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $543.9M | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $497.3M | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | 15.87× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $183.5M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 98.8% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.16× | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $326.2M | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $183.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.8M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.0M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.3M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.8M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.2M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $175.0M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.3M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.8M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.1M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.2M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 98.8% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.4% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.9% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.16× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.61× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.72× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.84× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.54× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.60× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.64× | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.40× | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCMG
| Asset Management1 | $108.6M | 61% |
| Management Service Incentive Performance Fees | $61.7M | 35% |
| Management Service Incentive Carried Interest | $5.1M | 3% |
| Service Other | $1.8M | 1% |
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |