vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GENESCO INC (GCO) and Bristow Group Inc. (VTOL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GENESCO INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($616.2M vs $377.3M, roughly 1.6× Bristow Group Inc.). Bristow Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs 0.9%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bristow Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs 3.3%). Bristow Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($47.8M vs $-31.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Bristow Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.8% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Genesco Inc. is an American publicly owned specialty retailer of branded footwear and accessories and is a wholesaler of branded and licensed footwear based in Nashville, Tennessee. Founded back in 1924 as Jarman Shoe Company, a footwear manufacturer, the company changed its name to General Shoe Corporation in 1933, and became a public company in 1939. By 1957, its stock would be included in the first S&P 500 Index. The company took its current name, Genesco—an acronym derived from its earlie...
Bristow Helicopters Limited is a British civil helicopter operator originally based at Aberdeen Airport, Scotland, which is currently a part of the U.S.-based Bristow Group which in turn has its corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas, U.S. In 2020, Bristow Group was merged with Era Helicopters, a large U.S.-based commercial helicopter operator that was previously a division of Era Aviation, with the two companies then continuing to use the Bristow name.
GCO vs VTOL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $616.2M | $377.3M |
| Net Profit | $5.4M | $18.4M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 128.3% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $616.2M | $377.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.0M | $386.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $474.0M | $376.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.9M | $350.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.3M | $353.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $525.2M | $365.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $457.6M | $359.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $739.0M | $337.1M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.5M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.2M | $31.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $27.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.0M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.3M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.50 | $0.61 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.79 | $1.72 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.02 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.16 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.76 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.91 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.23 | $0.96 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.29 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.0M | $286.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $89.5M | $671.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $513.8M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.0M | $286.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $245.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.7M | $251.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | $191.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | $247.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.9M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.2M | $178.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.2M | $140.6M |
| Q4 25 | $89.5M | $671.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | $675.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.0M | $705.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $701.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.1M | $689.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.8M | $629.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.4M | $594.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.7M | $544.1M |
| Q4 25 | $513.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $522.2M | $984.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $547.0M | $931.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $516.9M | $891.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.6M | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $548.5M | $849.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $571.2M | $820.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.19× | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.06× | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.9M | $76.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.5M | $47.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.1% | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 7.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.41× | 4.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $23.5M | $56.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.9M | $76.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.3M | $23.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-101.0M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.0M | $-603.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.1M | $51.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.7M | $33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.3M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-31.5M | $47.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.7M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-119.9M | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.3M | $-52.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.2M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.1M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.8M | $-37.9M |
| Q4 25 | -5.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | -15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.1% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.8% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 19.2% |
| Q4 25 | -2.41× | 4.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.40× | -0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.35× | 4.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCO
| Journeys Group Segment | $376.7M | 61% |
| Schuh Group Segment | $123.8M | 20% |
| Johnston And Murphy Group Segment | $81.2M | 13% |
| Genesco Brands Segment | $34.6M | 6% |
| Store Restructuring | $3.9M | 1% |
VTOL
| Offshore Energy Services | $247.5M | 66% |
| Government Services | $100.1M | 27% |
| Other | $21.9M | 6% |
| Related Party | $7.8M | 2% |
