vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of General Dynamics (GD) and Jabil (JBL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
General Dynamics is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.5B vs $8.3B, roughly 1.6× Jabil). General Dynamics runs the higher net margin — 8.3% vs 1.8%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Jabil posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 10.3%). General Dynamics produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.0B vs $228.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Jabil's revenue compounded faster (10.8% CAGR vs 6.1%).
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S.
JabilJBLEarnings & Financial Report
Jabil Inc. is an American multinational manufacturing company involved in the design, engineering, and manufacturing of electronic circuit board assemblies and systems, along with supply chain services, primarily serving original equipment manufacturers. It is headquartered in the Gateway area of St. Petersburg, Florida. It is one of the largest companies in the Tampa Bay area.
GD vs JBL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.5B | $8.3B |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $146.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 8.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | 8.3% | 1.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 18.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 13.2% | 46.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.10 | $1.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.4B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.0B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.3B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $6.8B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $146.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $222.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $994.0M | $117.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $930.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $905.0M | $129.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 3.9% |
| Q1 26 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | $4.10 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.95 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.7B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.3B | $2.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.1B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $59.0B | $19.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | 2.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $26.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | $59.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $57.2B | $19.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.6B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.9B | $18.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.6B | $17.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.9B | $17.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4B | $17.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.32× | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.12× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.26× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $323.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.0B | $228.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.5% | 2.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.2B | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $323.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $588.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $406.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-148.0M | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $312.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $535.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $814.0M | $515.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $228.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $419.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $320.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-290.0M | $218.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $215.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $411.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $613.0M | $409.0M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 6.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | 1.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.15× | 2.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.88× | 3.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.52× | 3.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 3.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GD
Segment breakdown not available.
JBL
| Intelligent Infrastructure | $4.0B | 49% |
| Transferred Over Time | $2.9B | 35% |
| Connected Living And Digital Commerce | $1.2B | 15% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $127.0M | 2% |
