vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN) and HANMI FINANCIAL CORP (HAFC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.1M vs $71.2M, roughly 1.5× HANMI FINANCIAL CORP). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -1.4%, a 31.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HANMI FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.1% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 10.4%).
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
Hanmi Bank Corporation is a community bank headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with 35 branches and eight loan production offices in California, Texas, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Virginia.
GDYN vs HAFC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.1M | $71.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | $21.2M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 61.7% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 17.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -150.6% | 20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.70 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $104.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.2M | $71.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.2M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.1M | $65.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | $62.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.3M | $60.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.4M | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | $56.7M |
| Q1 26 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $306.0K | $21.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-817.0K | $14.5M |
| Q1 26 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 61.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $327.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $530.1M | $796.4M |
| Total Assets | $605.0M | $7.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $327.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $342.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $530.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.1M | $796.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.7M | $779.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $532.2M | $762.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $517.4M | $751.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $517.8M | $732.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.2M | $736.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.4M | $707.1M |
| Q1 26 | $605.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $612.9M | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.2M | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $608.9M | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.9M | $7.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.2M | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.3M | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.6M | $7.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $206.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $203.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 286.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $356.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $206.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $146.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | $2.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $203.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $25.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $49.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $1.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 286.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 206.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 40.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 82.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.34× | 9.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.92× | 6.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.73× | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.21× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 2.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.15× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
