vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN) and Information Services Group Inc. (III). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.1M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.7× Information Services Group Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -1.4%, a 5.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Information Services Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
GDYN vs III — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.1M | $61.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | 61.7% | 8.4% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -150.6% | -14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $104.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.2M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.2M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.1M | $61.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.3M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.4M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | $64.3M |
| Q1 26 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $306.0K | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-817.0K | $2.0M |
| Q1 26 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | 44.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.3% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | 61.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 5.7% |
| Q1 26 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $327.5M | $28.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $530.1M | $94.7M |
| Total Assets | $605.0M | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $327.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $342.1M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.6M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.8M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | $11.8M |
| Q1 26 | $530.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.1M | $94.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.7M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $532.2M | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $517.4M | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $517.8M | $96.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.2M | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.4M | $95.5M |
| Q1 26 | $605.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $612.9M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.2M | $213.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $608.9M | $200.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.9M | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.2M | $204.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.3M | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.6M | $235.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $25.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $978.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | $2.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $141.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $1.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.34× | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.92× | 3.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.73× | 5.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.21× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.15× | 7.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
