vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN) and Phreesia, Inc. (PHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Phreesia, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.3M vs $104.1M, roughly 1.2× GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.). Phreesia, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs -1.4%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Phreesia, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.7% vs 3.7%).
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
Phreesia, Inc. is a software as a service company that offers healthcare organizations a set of applications to automate and manage patient intake.
GDYN vs PHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.1M | $120.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | $4.3M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 61.7% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 12.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -150.6% | 129.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $104.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.2M | $120.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.2M | $117.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.1M | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $306.0K | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $654.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-817.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 61.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $327.5M | $106.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $530.1M | $320.3M |
| Total Assets | $605.0M | $423.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $327.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $342.1M | $106.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.6M | $98.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.8M | $90.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $530.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.1M | $320.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.7M | $298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $532.2M | $282.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $517.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $517.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $605.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $612.9M | $423.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.2M | $408.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $608.9M | $400.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $15.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $12.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 10.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.34× | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.92× | 22.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GDYN
Segment breakdown not available.
PHR
| Subscription And Services | $55.5M | 46% |
| Network Solutions | $37.4M | 31% |
| Payment Processing Fees | $27.4M | 23% |
