vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and GRIFFON CORP (GFF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $649.1M, roughly 1.9× GRIFFON CORP). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 9.9%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
GEN vs GFF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $649.1M |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $64.4M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | 17.5% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | -9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $1.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $649.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $662.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $613.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $611.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $632.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $659.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $647.8M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $64.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $43.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-120.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $56.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $70.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $62.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $41.1M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 41.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 38.5% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 13.8% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $1.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $1.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $108.9M |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $107.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $133.5M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $108.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $214.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $227.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $224.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $223.5M |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | 7.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | 6.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | 6.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | 6.74× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $107.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $99.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 15.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $278.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $123.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $122.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $99.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $114.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $125.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $107.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | 16.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | 2.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |
