vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and LEGGETT & PLATT INC (LEG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $938.6M, roughly 1.3× LEGGETT & PLATT INC). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 2.7%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs -11.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs -7.5%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
LEGGETT & PLATT INCLEGEarnings & Financial Report
Leggett & Platt (L&P), based in Carthage, Missouri, is an American diversified manufacturer that designs and produces various engineered components and products that can be found in homes and automobiles. The firm was founded in 1883, and consists of 15 business units, 20,000 employee-partners, and 135 manufacturing facilities located in 18 countries.
GEN vs LEG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $938.6M |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $25.1M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 17.9% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | 2.0% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 2.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | -11.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | 76.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $938.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $52.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $44.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $-602.2M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 16.5% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | -56.2% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | -53.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $-4.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $587.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $3.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 1.46× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $587.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $460.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $368.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $412.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $350.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $277.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $307.0M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $971.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $855.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $746.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $689.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $741.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $667.6M |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | 1.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | 2.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | 2.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | 2.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | 2.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $121.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $101.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 10.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.84× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $281.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $121.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $125.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $122.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $94.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $110.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $75.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $100.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $77.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $78.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | 4.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 8.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | 2.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
LEG
| Bedding Products | $373.8M | 40% |
| Flooring And Textile Products Group | $196.9M | 21% |
| Automotive Group | $194.9M | 21% |
| Work Furniture Group | $66.2M | 7% |
| Home Furniture Group | $61.0M | 6% |
| Hydraulic Cylinders | $45.8M | 5% |
