vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× M/I HOMES, INC.). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 5.6%, a 9.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs -4.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 4.7%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
M/I Homes, Inc. is a leading U.S. residential construction company that designs, builds and sells single-family homes, townhomes and duplexes across multiple U.S. states. It caters to entry-level, move-up and luxury homebuyers, offering energy-efficient designs, flexible floor plans and personalized customization options.
GEN vs MHO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $64.0M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | -4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | -52.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $2.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $976.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $106.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $133.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $145.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $146.7M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 27.9% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 16.8% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $2.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $3.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $3.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $4.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $5.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $5.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $4.3B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-8.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $127.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $64.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $-67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $27.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $42.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $102.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $-68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $22.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | -0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 0.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | -0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | 0.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
MHO
| Southern Homebuilding | $615.6M | 54% |
| Northern Homebuilding | $503.9M | 44% |
| Financial Service | $27.8M | 2% |
| Land | $4.7M | 0% |
