vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and Natera, Inc. (NTRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $665.5M, roughly 1.9× Natera, Inc.). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 7.1%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Natera, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.8% vs 28.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Natera, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.5% CAGR vs 13.2%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
Natera, Inc. is a clinical genetic testing company based in Austin, Texas that specializes in non-invasive, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing technology, with a focus on women’s health, cancer, and organ health. Natera’s proprietary technology combines novel molecular biology techniques with a suite of bioinformatics software that allows detection down to a single molecule in a tube of blood. Natera operates CAP-accredited laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment...
GEN vs NTRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $665.5M |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $47.3M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | -3.4% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | 39.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | 187.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $665.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $592.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $546.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $501.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $476.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $439.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $413.4M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $-66.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $-53.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $-37.5M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | -13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | -10.6% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | -9.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $-0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $90.3M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $878.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $836.5M |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $73.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $37.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $109.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $59.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $44.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $52.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $4.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $-7.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | -1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
NTRA
Segment breakdown not available.
