vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and RH (RH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $883.8M, roughly 1.4× RH). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 4.1%, a 11.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 8.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 9.4%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
RH is an upscale American home-furnishings company headquartered in Corte Madera, California. The company sells its merchandise through its retail stores, catalog, and online. As of August 2018, the company operated a total of 70 galleries, 18 full-line design galleries, and 3 baby-and-child galleries. The company also has 36 outlet stores in the United States and Canada.
GEN vs RH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $883.8M |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $36.3M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | 12.0% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | 9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $1.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $883.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $814.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $812.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $811.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $829.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $727.0M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $-3.6M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 44.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 43.5% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 7.5% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | -0.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $1.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $1.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $43.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $101.8M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $-40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $-163.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $-183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $-234.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $-289.9M |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $131.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $83.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $128.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $131.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $86.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $56.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $80.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $-69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $-37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $-10.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | -1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | 3.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | -1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | -0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
RH
| RH Segment | $835.8M | 95% |
| Waterworks Segment | $48.0M | 5% |
| Gift Card And Merchandise Credit | $4.5M | 1% |
