vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $786.9M, roughly 1.6× RANGE RESOURCES CORP). RANGE RESOURCES CORP runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 15.5%, a 7.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 18.0%). Over the past eight quarters, RANGE RESOURCES CORP's revenue compounded faster (14.6% CAGR vs 13.2%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
Range Resources Corporation is a natural gas exploration and production company, the headquartered is in Fort Worth, Texas. It operates in the Marcellus Formation, where it is the largest land owners.
GEN vs RRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $786.9M |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $179.1M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 94.5% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | 18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | 88.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $786.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $655.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $699.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $846.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $667.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $513.2M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $179.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $94.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $28.7M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 94.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 92.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 95.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 93.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 93.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 94.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 93.4% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $204.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $204.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $175.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $134.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $344.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $277.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $251.1M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | 0.44× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $257.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $247.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $336.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $330.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $217.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $245.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $148.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 2.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | 5.18× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
RRC
| Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids And Oil Sales | $745.5M | 95% |
| Brokered Natural Gas And Marketing | $41.3M | 5% |