vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and RXO, Inc. (RXO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RXO, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -3.1%, a 18.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs -11.9%). Over the past eight quarters, RXO, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.8% CAGR vs 13.2%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
RXO, Inc. is a leading transportation and logistics solutions provider headquartered in the United States. Its core service portfolio includes freight brokerage, last-mile delivery for heavy and bulky goods, managed transportation services, and end-to-end supply chain optimization support, primarily catering to clients across the North American manufacturing, retail, and e-commerce segments.
GEN vs RXO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $-46.0M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | -2.9% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | -3.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | -11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | -84.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $930.0M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $-46.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $-31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $-243.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $-7.0M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | -23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | -0.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $-1.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $17.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | $387.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.25× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $35.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $7.0M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | $387.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $387.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $387.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $387.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $351.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $352.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | $370.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $579.0M |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | 0.24× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | 0.64× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-9.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-8.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $-5.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $-18.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $-16.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | -1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
RXO
| Retail Sector | $546.0M | 37% |
| Last Mile | $298.0M | 20% |
| Food And Beverage Sector | $225.0M | 15% |
| Other Sector | $185.0M | 13% |
| Managed Transportation | $133.0M | 9% |
| Automotive Sector | $93.0M | 6% |
