vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp (VAC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.0× MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -35.0%, a 50.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs -0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 5.2%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation is a pure-play public timeshare company. Formerly a division of Marriott International, Marriott Vacations Worldwide was established as a separate, publicly traded entity focusing primarily on vacation ownership in November 2011. Marriott Vacations Worldwide runs more than 120 resorts with over 700,000 Owners and members in a diverse portfolio of brands under The Marriott Vacation Clubs name. Its brands include Marriott Vacation Club, The Marriott Vaca...
GEN vs VAC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $-431.0M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | -35.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | -962.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $-12.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $-431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $37.0M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | -35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $-12.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $1.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $406.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $474.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $196.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $206.0M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $9.6B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $6.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-29.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $30.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $17.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
VAC
| Cost Reimbursement | $467.0M | 38% |
| Time Share | $381.0M | 31% |
| Management And Exchange | $212.0M | 17% |
| Ancillary Revenues | $64.0M | 5% |
| Management Service | $55.0M | 4% |
| Service Other | $36.0M | 3% |
